<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Rorty has died</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/richard-rorty-has-died/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/richard-rorty-has-died/</link>
	<description>cognition, language, social systems; statistics, visualization, computation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/richard-rorty-has-died/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=71#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sounds like  you have lots of rad books.  i should borrow one sometime]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like  you have lots of rad books.  i should borrow one sometime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeLove</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/richard-rorty-has-died/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeLove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=71#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got into his books in an obsessive way after taking apparently his last class at Stanford.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He goes off the deep end but has an interesting perspective which is generally romantic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got into his books in an obsessive way after taking apparently his last class at Stanford.</p>
<p>He goes off the deep end but has an interesting perspective which is generally romantic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/richard-rorty-has-died/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=71#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the recommendation.  I wouldn&#039;t be too sure that economists read him -- tyler cowen just seems really in to philosophy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recommendation.  I wouldn&#8217;t be too sure that economists read him &#8212; tyler cowen just seems really in to philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/richard-rorty-has-died/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=71#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is already a surprising amount of noise out there about how much of an influence Rorty had or should have had. See, especially, the thread on him at Crooked Timber. Having read some of his stuff, I think that Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature might appeal to you, until the crazy chapter on hermeneutics. I think he later recanted that one, although I&#039;m not 100% on that. He&#039;s made some interesting arguments on topics that I&#039;m interested in, mostly scattered across the above book and several essays. For an interesting perspective, check out &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/06/richard_rorty_d.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post by Tyler Cowen&lt;/a&gt; on Rorty&#039;s impact on economics. It was news to me since I didn&#039;t realize economists read him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already a surprising amount of noise out there about how much of an influence Rorty had or should have had. See, especially, the thread on him at Crooked Timber. Having read some of his stuff, I think that Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature might appeal to you, until the crazy chapter on hermeneutics. I think he later recanted that one, although I&#8217;m not 100% on that. He&#8217;s made some interesting arguments on topics that I&#8217;m interested in, mostly scattered across the above book and several essays. For an interesting perspective, check out <a HREF="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/06/richard_rorty_d.html" REL="nofollow">this post by Tyler Cowen</a> on Rorty&#8217;s impact on economics. It was news to me since I didn&#8217;t realize economists read him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
