<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Time will tell, epistemology won&#8217;t&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/time-will-tell-epistemology-wont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/time-will-tell-epistemology-wont/</link>
	<description>cognition, language, social systems; statistics, visualization, computation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/time-will-tell-epistemology-wont/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=72#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking back over your post, Rorty probably would not have thought the semantic web was a good idea, for philosophical reasons. As far as I know, he was against the idea that there was a final description of things, e.g. that got at their essence. New purposes and new developments would necessitate the use of new descriptions. Although, I imagine the semantic web is having difficulty for more practical and less lofty philosophical reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking back over your post, Rorty probably would not have thought the semantic web was a good idea, for philosophical reasons. As far as I know, he was against the idea that there was a final description of things, e.g. that got at their essence. New purposes and new developments would necessitate the use of new descriptions. Although, I imagine the semantic web is having difficulty for more practical and less lofty philosophical reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/time-will-tell-epistemology-wont/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=72#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both far too much, and not nearly enough]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both far too much, and not nearly enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://brenocon.com/blog/2007/06/time-will-tell-epistemology-wont/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anyall.org/?p=72#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe my image of AI engineers is wrong. How often does someone mention epistemology in a meeting?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe my image of AI engineers is wrong. How often does someone mention epistemology in a meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
